No bargain. With the Mate X3, Huawei offers its latest foldable. The concept has been completely revised and the foldable display has now been moved inside as well. In addition, there is a lot of storage, a fast SoC, and a convincing camera setup. However, it is only recommendable for very few due to the known limitations.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Anton Avdyushkin (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 🇩🇪
The Mate X3 is the latest foldable smartphone from Huawei, which is the successor of the Mate Xs 2 and for the first time no longer relies on an external panel, but shifts the foldable screen to the inside, as is the case with the competition.
Huawei’s smartphone relies on upscale features, but it is not quite inexpensive at 2,199 Euros (~$4,000). Find out everything about the Mate X3 in the following review.
Display
7.85 inch 10.10:9, 2496 x 2224 pixel 426 PPI, Capacitive, OLED, 1 – 120 Hz LTPO-OLED, 1440 Hz PWM-Dimming; Cover display: 6.4 inches, 2504 x 1080, 1 – 120 Hz LTPO-OLED, 1440 Hz PWM-Dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB
, 490.33 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: NanoMemory-Card (up to 256 GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeter, color spectrum, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.3 x 156.9 x 141.5 ( = 0.21 x 6.18 x 5.57 in)
Battery
4800 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm) + 12 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/3.4, 125 mm) + 13 MPix (Ultrawide, f/2.2, 13 mm); Camera2-API: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-Cabel, SIM-Tool, transparent case, 66W-Charger, EMUI 13.1, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), fanless, waterproof
Weight
239 g ( = 8.43 oz / 0.53 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating |
Date |
Model |
Weight |
Drive |
Size |
Resolution |
Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.3 % |
06/2023 |
Huawei Mate X3 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 |
239 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 7.85″ | 2496×2224 | |
89.8 % |
10/2022 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 |
263 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 7.60″ | 2176×1812 | |
87.2 % |
03/2023 |
Honor Magic Vs SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 |
261 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 7.90″ | 2272×1984 | |
86.9 % |
08/2022 |
Vivo X Fold SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 |
311 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 8.03″ | 2160×1916 | |
86.3 % |
12/2022 |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 |
262 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 8.02″ | 2160×1914 |
The Huawei Mate X3 is available in black and dark green. Unlike all its predecessors, the foldable display is no longer on the outside, but moved to the inside, while an additional panel is integrated on the outside so that the Mate X3 can also be used when folded. It features a very slim design and is also the lightest foldable in the comparison field. Even when folded, it does not look too thick (H x W x D: 156.9 x 72.4 x 11.08 mm). The protruding camera hump pleases us visually and at least when folded, the Mate X3 does not wobble back and forth.
The build quality is convincing. The gaps are tight and very even. Careful twisting attempts do not affect the foldable and do not elicit any creaking. While Kunlun glass is used on the outside, which we already know from the P60 Pro the foldable panel is protected by a protective film that cannot be removed and is made up of several layers. One of them is made of a non-Newtonian, liquid material that is supposed to increase the impact resistance by four times. Huawei displays a corresponding note for handling the smartphone when setting it up (see screenshot).
The hinge has been reworked once again and is not only more durable but can also keep the folding display of the Mate X3 in a stable position continuously within a 130° angle. Furthermore, the phone is waterproof according to IPX8 and thus protected against complete and permanent submersion in fresh water. The Mate X3 is not spared from the typical folds of a foldable, but the edges close flush when folded and no unsightly gaps remain.
Huawei’s Mate X3 offers 512 GB of internal storage and the additional option to expand it with a NanoMemory Card, which can hold up to 256 GB.
The USB 3.2 (Gen. 1) port supports wired image output, including desktop mode, as well as OTG. The data transfer presents itself as very fast with 391.13 MB/s in the test.
Furthermore, an IR blaster, NFC and Bluetooth 5.2 are also on board.
The Mate X3 cannot use microSD cards, but Huawei’s own NanoMemory cards, which can reach a capacity of up to 256 GB.
The card reader’s speed is really fast and almost completely uses the standard’s possibilities (max. 90 MB/s).
SD Card Reader – average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Huawei NanoMemory) |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Huawei NanoMemory) |
|
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Huawei NanoMemory: Ø49.7 (22.6-59.2)
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø28.3 (19.6-31.9)
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Huawei NanoMemory: Ø61.2 (8.2-66)
Sony Xperia 1 V Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø45.7 (28.7-176.3)
The Huawei Mate X3 ships with EMUI 13.1 in Europe, which is based on Android 12. Harmony OS 3.1 is used in the Asian markets, which does not differ in terms of looks and structure. Huawei does not provide detailed information about the update supply, but it has always been good in the past. The security patches were updated on April 1, 2023 at the time of the test and are thus no longer up-to-date.
As in the past years, the Mate X3 still has to do without Google services and the corresponding apps. Huawei’s own AppGallery contains many well-known apps, but major American providers like Meta, Netflix, and Disney are missing. Many of these apps can be downloaded and installed via other platforms using the Petal search, but this is anything but easy, especially for less tech-savvy users. A better alternative can be the GBox, which is easy to install and provides the Play Store and most Google services. However, this can lead to increased battery consumption, and it is not harmless in terms of data protection.
Like its predecessor, Huawei is not allowed to integrate 5G mobile in the Mate X3. Accordingly, LTE is available at best, but it has a broad frequency coverage.
Huawei’s smartphone achieves fast and stable transmission rates in combination with our reference router Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000. However, it does not support Wi-Fi 6E or Wi-Fi 7 and thus no 6 GHz WLAN. Huawei promises the use of VHT160, which should allow data rates beyond 1 GBit/s in the 5 GHz network without problems. However, the Mate X3 did not achieve these in the test.
Networking | |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Vivo X Fold Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Average of class Smartphone |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø927 (851-952)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (836-927)
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (888-965)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (455-948)
With broad GNSS support and an integrated barometer, the Huawei Mate X3 has the best prerequisites to guide its owner safely through unknown terrain. The Satfix is very fast and accurate even indoors.
During a short bike ride, the foldable has to face comparison with the Garmin Venu 2. The recorded route of around 10 kilometers is 90 meters shorter on the X3, but the altitude meters are almost identical. A look at the detailed route shows that Huawei’s smartphone records the route well, but it is sometimes a bit off track.
Huawei’s Mate X3 supports features like VoLTE and WLAN calls, but SIP account control is not implemented into the system. It can take up to two nano-SIM cards as long as one slot is not occupied by an optional memory card. The Foldable does not have an eSIM.
The voice quality is very good when held to the ear and even louder ambient noise is reliably filtered out. The speaker is also decent but reverberates a bit.
Each display of the Mate X3 has its own 8 MPix camera, both of which have an f/2.4 aperture and allow decent selfies. Videos can be recorded in Ultra HD at best, but the optics on the small display are limited to 30 FPS, while the one on the foldable panel is also capable of 60 FPS despite the identical resolution.
If you like, you can also use the main camera setup as the front camera. All you have to do is press a button in the app and the additional display then serves as a viewfinder. But especially for conventional photography, the Huawei Mate X3 can fully show its strengths and takes good pictures in daylight. Low-light pictures also turn out well, but they are a bit too reddish. The ultra wide-angle lens could have emphasized contours a bit more and the lens curvature becomes quite visible towards the edge, but it does a good job otherwise and is also responsible for macro subjects. The periscope optics allow a five-fold optical magnification, including optical image stabilization (OIS), which no other foldable smartphone offers. Digitally, even a 50x magnification is possible.
Videos can be recorded in Ultra HD with 30 or 60 FPS.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
click to load images
11.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
The Huawei Mate X3 has a 24-month warranty in Germany. It comes with a clear protective case that clips onto the back with the camera. A modular 66-Watt power supply is also included, as well as a matching USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), an additional protective film for the cover display, and a SIM tool.
Both capacitive touchscreens of the Huawei Mate X3 work very reliably in the test. However, the surface of the cover display is noticeably more slippery and offers less resistance to the fingers. Like the Galaxy Z Fold4, Huawei’s foldable also supports active pen input for the main display, but the necessary Huawei M-Pen 2s is currently only available in Asia. However, it can be imported via AliExpress (148 euro).
A fingerprint sensor in the power button is available for biometric security. It has very good recognition rates and unlocks the X3 quickly. Face recognition can be used additionally or alternatively, but it is less secure.
The X3 is again capable of finger-touch input, supports numerous gestures and even has a senior mode on board, which can be used to adjust the display size and control the touchscreen’s typing time, among other things.
The main display of the Huawei Mate X3 is now on the inside and grows minimally to 7.85 inches. It supports the HDR standards HLG, HDR10, and HDR10+. The refresh rate of the LTPO OLED panel reaches up to 120 Hz, the system dynamically adjusts this between 1 and 120 Hz, alternatively, it is possible to fix the refresh rate to 60 or 120 Hz.
The brightness has been improved compared to the Mate Xs 2 and now reaches an average of 969 cd/m2 when the ambient light sensor is active. This value remains on the same level even with an even distribution of bright and dark areas (APL18), and the brightness is not increased further even in HDR rendering. Those who prefer to adjust the brightness manually have 476 cd/m2 at their disposal.
The smaller cover display on the outside also relies on OLED technology, but it can get even brighter. While the brightness is almost identical in manual mode (max. 479 cd/m2), the smaller panel can increase a bit in the APL18 test and reaches up to 1,239 cd/m2.
OLED flickering is very similar in both displays. We measured a fairly constant 90 Hz depending on the zoom level, which could be a burn-in protection or black frame insertion. Zooming in closer, we can measure a frequency between 425 and 549 Hz at minimum display brightness. The Mate X3 uses PWM dimming with 1,440 Hz for both displays, which is considered comparatively easy on the eyes.
978 cd/m² |
948 cd/m² |
946 cd/m² |
||
997 cd/m² |
948 cd/m² |
966 cd/m² |
||
1010 cd/m² |
957 cd/m² |
974 cd/m² |
||
Distribution of brightness
Foldable Display (X-Rite i1Pro 3)
Maximum: 1010 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 969.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 948 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15
1161 cd/m² |
1163 cd/m² |
1140 cd/m² |
||
1169 cd/m² |
1160 cd/m² |
1163 cd/m² |
||
1164 cd/m² |
1163 cd/m² |
1196 cd/m² |
||
Distribution of brightness
Cover Display (X-Rite i1Pro 3)
Maximum: 1196 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1164.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1160 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Huawei Mate X3 OLED, 2496×2224, 7.85 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 2176×1812, 7.60 |
Honor Magic Vs OLED, 2272×1984, 7.90 |
Vivo X Fold AMOLED, 2160×1916, 8.03 |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 OLED, 2160×1914, 8.02 |
Huawei Mate Xs 2 OLED, 2480×2220, 7.80 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen |
-9% |
-58% |
-12% |
-14% |
-70% |
|
Brightness middle |
948 |
913 -4% |
803 -15% |
730 -23% |
1015 7% |
763 -20% |
Brightness |
969 |
929 -4% |
809 -17% |
724 -25% |
1022 5% |
769 -21% |
Brightness Distribution |
94 |
96 2% |
97 3% |
95 1% |
98 4% |
95 1% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * |
1.4 |
1.7 -21% |
2.27 -62% |
1.66 -19% |
1.6 -14% |
2.8 -100% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * |
2.6 |
3.6 -38% |
5.99 -130% |
2.92 -12% |
3.4 -31% |
5.9 -127% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * |
1.7 |
1.5 12% |
3.9 -129% |
1.6 6% |
2.6 -53% |
4.3 -153% |
Gamma |
2.15 102% |
2.16 102% |
2.25 98% |
2.28 96% |
2.22 99% |
2.24 98% |
CCT |
6539 99% |
6515 100% |
6234 104% |
6395 102% |
6506 100% |
6457 101% |
* … smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 484 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 484 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 484 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19025 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings
The analysis with Calman shows that the two displays of the Huawei Mate X3 are both well-calibrated and matched.
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.36 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.711 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6495 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.2 ms). |
||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.64 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8385 ms rise | |
↘ 0.802 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35 ms). |
Outdoors, the Mate X3 remains easy to read even in sunlight and the ambient light sensors always adjust the brightness quickly.
The viewing angle stability of the foldable display remains a bit better in terms of color representation because the cover display shows a slightly warmer picture at flat viewing angles. However, this does not bother in everyday use.
The Huawei Mate X3 is powered by a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the 4G version and has access to a generous 12 GB of LPDDR5 working memory. Thus, the SoC is not cutting-edge, but it is still very fast and also used by many rivals.
The benchmarks are within the expected range and certify the Huawei smartphone’s high performance. Even though a performance mode is available again, we did not use it. The differences are not too big, but the option is particularly noticeable in terms of heat development.
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Single-Core | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 – 1356, n=20) |
|
Vivo X Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192 |
|
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (119 – 1885, n=238, last 2 years) |
|
Multi-Core | |
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 – 4436, n=20) |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Vivo X Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (473 – 5538, n=238, last 2 years) |
|
Geekbench 6.1 | |
Single-Core | |
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (438 – 1806, n=7, last 2 years) |
|
Multi-Core | |
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (1217 – 4656, n=7, last 2 years) |
|
Antutu v9 – Total Score | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 – 1119358, n=18) |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (111952 – 1322448, n=164, last 2 years) |
|
PCMark for Android – Work 3.0 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 – 17727, n=19) |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Vivo X Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (4780 – 28378, n=226, last 2 years) |
|
CrossMark – Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 – 1178, n=18) |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (226 – 1356, n=135, last 2 years) |
|
BaseMark OS II | |
Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 – 8753, n=18) |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192 |
|
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (411 – 9585, n=164, last 2 years) |
|
System | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 – 13563, n=18) |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (2565 – 19657, n=164, last 2 years) |
|
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Memory | |
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 – 9114, n=18) |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (670 – 11617, n=164, last 2 years) |
|
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Graphics | |
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16742 – 26660, n=18) |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (697 – 30125, n=164, last 2 years) |
|
Web | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 – 2006, n=18) |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average of class Smartphone (10 – 2392, n=164, last 2 years) |
|
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 8192 |
|
UL Procyon AI Inference – Overall Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 – 84787, n=16) |
|
Average of class Smartphone (207 – 84787, n=116, last 2 years) |
|
Honor Magic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 |
|
The graphics calculations are handled by the integrated Adreno 730 which was the fastest GPU for Android smartphones in 2022. The Mate X3 delivers a convincing performance in the benchmarks and can often place itself at the top of the comparison field. Thus, there is more than enough performance for games and other graphics-intensive apps.
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Vivo X Fold Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Vivo X Fold Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Vivo X Fold Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Vivo X Fold Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Vivo X Fold Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Vivo X Fold Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Vivo X Fold Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
Jetstream 2 – Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105) |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 – 155, n=18) |
|
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111) |
|
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4) |
|
Average of class Smartphone (17.3 – 282, n=167, last 2 years) |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7) |
|
WebXPRT 4 – Overall Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105) |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 – 146, n=16) |
|
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4) |
|
Average of class Smartphone (25 – 202, n=93, last 2 years) |
|
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111) |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 |
|
Octane V2 – Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105) |
|
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4) |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 – 54646, n=19) |
|
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111) |
|
Average of class Smartphone (4633 – 74261, n=196, last 2 years) |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7) |
|
Huawei Mate Xs 2 (Huawei Browser 12.1) |
|
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 – Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (414 – 10031, n=169, last 2 years) |
|
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7) |
|
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (763 – 1707, n=17) |
|
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111) |
|
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4) |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105) |
|
* … smaller is better
Huawei Mate X3 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G | Honor Magic Vs | Vivo X Fold | Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 | Huawei Mate Xs 2 | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 |
-10% |
-15% |
-5% |
11% |
-23% |
-14% |
-40% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequential Read 256KB |
1953.41 |
1854.98 -5% |
1695.2 -13% |
1850.6 -5% |
1882.11 -4% |
1850.72 -5% |
Power Supply (max.) 33.1 °C = 92 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260 (±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11 (7.4-16.9) Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø6.91 (5.45-9.37) Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø44 (26.1-64.2) Huawei Mate Xs 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø24.1 (19.8-35.5) The two speakers of Huawei’s Mate X3 provide a pleasant soundscape at medium volume, but the mids and lows are about too thin at maximum. The USB port can be used to connect headphones and external speakers to the smartphone. Bluetooth 5.2 is available wirelessly, which supports the audio codecs SBC, AAC, LDAC and L2HC.
|